Agreed! And honestly, I wouldn't even say that it has to be something other than writing. I think there are perhaps even different approaches to "writing a shrine" that could be considered something new or innovative. But I do think it's up to us as a community to be open-minded, and not dismissive, when someone chooses to "shrine" something in a way that isn't necessarily a collection of analytical essays. Like you've said, writing is not everyone's forte, but that doesn't mean there aren't other creative ways of showing your love, or even analyzing something!Varen wrote:I think we should honestly consider opening Amassment to different possibilities. Another thing to consider is that many people say that they aren't writers. Therefore, writing isn't the best way to express themselves. Why should we ignore those who prefer to express their love through art, music, or graphics, etc.?
As someone who enjoys both fanlistings and shrines, I do think that there is a difference in the intensity of work that goes into a fanlisting vs. a shrine, hence the "elitism gap". (A form of elitism I don't necessarily agree with or practice, but is undeniably there. XD) While I can whip up a fanlisting in a matter of days, I spent half a year writing the content to my Ranka shrine. I also think that in general, most shrine owners see their shrines as ongoing projects, whereas normally once you make a fanlisting, it's simply a matter of maintaining it and perhaps changing layouts/adding codes occasionally. I also think that the difference in a fanlisting is that for the most part, it's a templated website with predetermined sections, whereas shrines are very much about original and personally curated content.Eden wrote:I also don't like how there are those who don't recognize the design/writing talents of people who just build fanlistings. ... The dedication is there, does it matter the content? I think fanlistings are small tributes so I don't discredit those. ... The elitism gap between shrines vs fanlistings bothered me a little, though that's starting to diminish.
That isn't to say that there aren't people that go above and beyond with their fanlistings, or even that someone who owns a shrine to Goku is better than someone who owns a fanlisting to Goku. You can't compare a level of love based on a site. I just think there is a different approach to creating a shrine than there is to creating a fanlisting, which is why even though a clear dedication and labor of love goes into fanlistings, the lack of more methodical content creation doesn't put it in the same category as a shrine? I don't really like the stigma that some shrine owners give to fanlistings, because I think it's something a lot of people enjoy. I just think they are really two separate entities entirely, therefore there's really not even any reason to compare them.
I'm kinda just rambling here! That being said, I still don't think that writing is the only way we can approach shrining--I am interested in seeing this conversation hopefully stimulate some people to try new directions. X3